Providing assistance to one’s suicide,
regardless of age, is a very controversial issue in the United States and in
other parts of the worlds. While others disagree, under certain circumstances Euthanasia
is a personal, dignified choice and should only be considered as a last resort
option, when death is inevitable, and the suffering is too much to bear.
When
pain becomes constant in a person’s body and their quality of life is slowly
wearing down, euthanasia can begin to seem like a reasonable solution. “The
principle of mercy requires that pain and suffering be relieved to the extent
possible.”(Battin, Margaret). Whether the situation involves a young,
terminally ill child, or an elderly person whose every breath is dependent on a
respirator, they along with their families are forced to realize their paths of
life are soon to end. Although letting nature take its course, is the opinion
of some on the issue of assisted-suicide and that doctors should not be at the
hand of death, others believe “physician assistance in bringing about death is
to be provoked just when the person voluntarily seeks it and just when it
serves to avoid pain and suffering”(Somerville, Margaret). Death at the hands
of a doctor can be unimaginable and some might even say it’s unethical. But,
when life can no longer be lived, or for that matter enjoyed, why should
physicians be criticized for being so-called murderers? They were respecting
the patient’s wishes, and what was best for them was kept in mind. “A typical
case might involve an irreversibly brain-damaged newborn, who, instead of dying
as expected, lingers on, suffering terribly. In such cases, some doctors feel
obligated to hasten death”(Magne, Charles).
Infants
are obviously not given a choice when it comes to the issue of
assisted-suicide, and can’t defend themselves when euthanasia is presented as
an option but, for older patients, they’re given a choice. “Proponents of
assisted-dying point to autonomy and mercy. The principle of autonomy holds
that people are entitled to be the architects, as much as possible, of how they
die.”(Battin, Margaret). It is not always logical but, we live in a world today
that allows it. Euthanasia “may feel like something the patient can openly
choose…we live in a society that tolerates many obfuscation and hypocrisies,
and this may be another we ought to embrace” (Battin, Margaret). Instead of
recognizing the negative possibilities to assisted-suicide, “a better approach
might be…developing quality palliative care programs that can address the
holistic needs of seriously ill and dying persons as well as the concerns of
their families”(Hamel,Ronald). Individuals don’t choose life but, they have a
choice in how to live it. No matter how far they travel, when someone decides
the end of the road is near, their paths should not be blocked by laws and
ignorance.
The
financial costs of a long-term illness can be overwhelming and “leave people in
debt. That makes ethicists fear that euthanasia might be requested for
financial reasons”(Magne, Charles). Assisted-suicide is not the greatest
solution for getting out of debt but, in the long-run, it can free up medical
funds to help others. The life of a person should not be reliant on machines or
constant struggles with disabilities. “The mere fact that a means was capable
of sustaining life did not necessarily mean it was beneficial to the person”
(Hamel, Ronald). Life is an incredibly valuable thing, and those who make it
worthwhile are worth even more. But, what happens when the weak cannot get
stronger and the sick can no longer get healthier? At that point, medical funds
would be of much better use benefitting life, rather than sustaining one that
can no longer be helped.
On
October 5, the Oregon law allowing doctors to prescribe lethal injections for
dying patients will be challenged by the opponents who strongly believe it is
murder. Although “most states…recognize a patient’s right to withdraw unwanted
life support machinery”, they prohibit the action of hastening death (Lavi,
Shai). Dying is a natural process, and many believe it should remain that way.
A major concern for doctors injecting death is the abuse of power and it “risks
undercutting the integrity of the medical profession”(Battin, Margaret). When all the options have been weighed and
debated on whether or not machines and hospitals should run the rest of what
very fragile life elderly and terminally ill patients have left, it is no
surprise to hear “institutional or social pressures might make people victims
of assisted-dying they did not want”(Battin, Margaret). As euthanasia became
more and more accepted in society, peer pressure became constant for the lives
of patients who were consumed by the walls of the hospitals. With no way out
for the terminally ill, they were unable to escape the words they tried so hard
to block out. The walls of their hospital room transformed into a high school,
full of pressure and the inability to decide for themselves.
Not
only does euthanasia end life, but, it manages to devalue humans in the
process. Experiencing pain is part of being a person, so why should lives have
to and want to end of something we were created to experience? Rabbi Michael
Goldberg, a former hospital chaplain believes, “A great deal of the suffering
at the end of life is either self-inflicted or inflicted by friends and
relatives, it’s not due to disease.” The option of death appeals to patients
because they may feel they do not want to burden their families. Lives should not
end because the pain is persistent, and for lives to reserve the right to
commit assisted-suicide, pushes the limits on freedom of choice.
Whether
or not doctors should inject lethal medication in patients who might or might
not have requested it is a widely discussed topic, and will continue to be for
years to come. There is no right or wrong, Euthanasia is a difficult decision,
and when doctors, religion, families and hospitals are all a part of the
discussion of assisted-suicide the choice becomes even more painfully
difficult. Many forget patients are human beings capable of making life
changing decisions and although the answer will not be easy for everyone to
digest, the best thing to do is respect the last requests of their patient.